\n
![](\"http:\/\/watches.cyberphreak.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2008\/03\/orvis-movement.jpg\")
<\/a>\nOk finishing and some fake tool marks. It did hack and hand wind, which was nice. It looked like 21,600 or 18,000 BPH and it was a little jerky. My Seikos are much more consistent moving the second hand around the dial. Needless to say, we are returning the watch. For the amount of money, it was pretty poor quality. The case finishing was poor (between the lugs was poorly finished) and the leather strap, well, sucked. Felt like plastic and was almost impossible to bend. But, there is a silver lining. For about the same money (well, a little less, actually) I am getting another Seiko!<\/p>\n
The SKX033.\u00a0 One of my favorites.\u00a0 A “Pepsi” bezel with a coin edge.\u00a0 Not a true diver, but I like the smaller case and Submariner styling.\u00a0 The hour markers are huge and should glow like a typical Seiko. \u00a0 I actually tried on a SKX031 in the store (black bezel) and was very impressed.\u00a0 Seiko really does spoil you with quality vs. money.\u00a0 All in house movements, nearly a century of watchmaking, and Japanese quality control.\u00a0 You can’t ask for much more. \u00a0 So in a week or two I should be wearing my new ‘033.<\/p>\n Finally got my belated Orvis watch birthday present. From the moment I saw it, I didn’t like it. The face of it was huge and an ugly shade of brown. The movement was an ugly Chinese Seagull movement, nothing like what was shown on the website. I still don’t know \u2026 Continue reading <\/a><\/p>\n<\/a><\/a><\/a>by <\/span><\/a>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"